Treading Water & Creating Memories

Figure Treading Water

I swam competitively as a child (until I got my driver’s license at 15), and I am pretty sure I could break records for treading water. It’s a metaphor I use often during weeks when there’s lots to accomplish and extenuating circumstances wreak havoc on “getting shit done”. But I remind myself that sometimes you have to tread water, but it’s not forever, and I have the mental, emotional, and physical strength to do it for a bit. Acknowledging “I Got This”, “It all gets done”, “Breathe”–three mantras told to me by three of my new colleagues who always, always have my back helps.  But then I need time to rest, so come on weekend, I say!

Two people (a nun from my childhood and an established, influential scholar and mentor in my field) died this week. Both women significantly influenced the person I am today. I have been reflecting on both of them a good bit. I’m working on blog posts for both, but the writing I do for my blog is certainly suffering this week. But you’ll hear more about them over the next week or so.

At the same time, I am fortunate to have one of the most influential women in my life here in Greenville for five days for a conference being hosted here at ECU. She’s played an incredible number of roles in my life including professor, mentor, dissertation director,  friend, collaborator, and confident. She is here for a Writing Center conference that two of my best friends are hosting here at ECU.  The graduate students I am working with are getting to meet and spend time with her, and she’s paying it forward, and to see their faces when I introduce them to my mentor and director is priceless. (You know, in my position, they feel like I was never at all like them and why would I have mentor.) My friend/mentor has reminded my students how much work she had to do with me. Just kidding…she’s way too classy for that but somehow they know. 😉

Even more exciting, we also had a chance to write today together at one of the coffee shops I frequent often, and we’re working on a chapter on mentoring networks. It seems fitting one of my new colleagues/friends picked her up from the airport because I was in a meeting and practically planned an article together.  We also had dinner with another new colleague/friend; they had never met but had heard SO much about each other from me that I think they felt like they knew each other. We discussed a series of potential projects. A really special time to be sure. And we’ll get to spend more time with friends on Saturday after the conference at our home.

There might have been a time in my life where I wouldn’t be able to enjoy the significance or uniqueness of this week given #allthework NOT getting done, but then I would have missed living and creating all of these fabulous memories this week together, with others, and with my students, some of who are experiencing their first academic conference.

For all these reasons and more, I’m pretty sure this week will be remembered as a highlight in my academic career.

Facebook is 10 Years

I have been on fb from almost the very beginning. According to the movie, 8 years years. Below is my movie. It reminded me of some great moments and just how important my fb friends have supported me over the years AND especially in the last 2 years.

Scary Realization

Since 2003, I have served on ECU’s Institutional Review Board as a non-scientist. These boards have to have certain types of members risk benefit ratioon the committee. Physicians, nurses, scientists, community members, and at least one non-scientist. In fact for a while, I was the only non-scientist, and if I was late, they couldn’t begin until I got there. [Lots of pressure.] Our job as a board is to make sure researchers have considered the risks to the participants and have a plan for minimizing those wisks. Participants have to consent to participate, and in order to do so, they need to be informed. I was originally recruited to discuss how we can make informed consent documents more understandable. After about the year 2005-2006, I began using the term humanist to describe my position on the committee since I understood that my main role on the committee was to advocate on behalf of the human subjects participants being asked to participate in research studies and clinical trials at ECU. My primary concern then and now are the rights, interests, and welfare of those participants, often actual patients dealing with scary, life-threatening diseases.  I don’t often understand all of the science (although after all this time, I do know lots about certain types of diseases and conditions), but I can advocate on behalf of the people participating in these studies.

While I can’t talk about the specific studies we review, the board reviews quite a bit of cancer trials from the cancer center and research related to heart disease, heart devices, high blood pressure, diabetes, and obesity. I continue to serve on this board for a number of reasons. First, it provides me with a way to serve the community and people where I live. I understand this work as community engagement. Second, it provides me with a mutually beneficial opportunity where I can use my own expertise in science, health, medical communication and writing to help educate others about the writing process and health literacy/communication issues. And third, it provides me with lots of examples for my teaching and with a context for understanding of how clinical research leads to new medical practices and treatments.

At some point in my tenure on the board, I realized ECU School of Medicine and Vidant Medical Center had a long history of doing and researching weight-loss surgery.

Change is difficult, Not changing is fatelIn fact, the bariatric program started here in 1978, and one of the bypass surgeries was originally referred to as the Greenville Gastric Bypass. It was some of the bariatric surgery research studies that led me to research these surgeries beginning in 2010 or so even before I was officially diagnosed with pre-diabetes. In doing my research, I realized that I met the criteria and would likely qualify for this surgery if I wanted to go this path. I was also struck by how the terms used to describe these surgeries changes depending on context. They are referred to as weight-loss surgeries, bariatric surgeries, gastric bypass surgeries, metabolic surgery.

And because of my education in rhetorical theory and technical communication, I questioned and was curious about the choice of language used to describe these surgeries and am currently trying to understand the cultural context and kairotic moment for the significant rise in these surgeries over the past decade based on the rhetoric used.r

Just to be clear, I am not criticizing or calling into question those that have had weight loss surgery, and I know it has helped many lose weight and solve other health problems. The research and the arguments for the surgery in reducing or “curing” diabetes are persuasive. However, I am interested though in how the language used to describe them seems to change from weight loss surgeries to more medicalized terms–bariatric, metabolic, and gastric bypass. I am also struck by the persuasiveness of the efficiency in which these surgeries seem to provide some people with fast weight loss. And for those who are overweight and have tried to lose weight over and over again, the holy grail of weight loss is FAST weight loss. Change is a process not an event

Researching weight loss surgeries and pre-diabetes helped me make a decision that worked for me. I might have chosen to do it if I had diabetes already, but I knew, from recording my blood sugar and blood pressure for a period of time that exercise kept these numbers exactly where they needed to be, plus, I felt better and it reduced my stress. More recently, I’ve decided to make this work my intellectual and academic research as well. I resisted writing about it before now because it seemed too personal, but now with experiential knowledge of how weight loss and medical/health/fitness rhetorics can work based on my own story, I feel more equipped to investigate these rhetorics in a systematic way. I also realized more recently just how gendered these messages are towards women. (more on this in another post.)

In academic terms, the work I do with the IRB is considered service, often the least valued of the important trinity of academic life (teaching and research being the other two). However, I was taught years ago by the nuns and others as part of my Catholic upbringing that we are to serve others when we are in positions to do so.

And after all these years, I am especially grateful that the knowledge gained as a member of this board helped me change my life.

Change or Same Switch

 

Quarterback Princess

After the Superbowl, I was telling some friends how I always loved playing football and spent manyQuarterback_Princess  afternoons with my brothers and the neighborhood boys playing in one of the vacant lots. I was reminded of one of my all-time favorite movies from my childhood:  Quarterback Princess. Not  many people have heard of it even though Helen Hunt plays the starring role. It was one of the first movies we video taped with our VHS VCR, and so I watched it for years after it came out.

For those not familiar, here’s a quick synopsis. A teenager moves to a new town and wants to play football. The small town and PTA are pretty sexist and don’t think girls should play football. She tries out and makes the team anyway, and she’s good, and they start winning. And she begins winning the favor of her teammates. So over the course of the movie and with some of your teammates who become allies, the sentiment towards her changes. At the end, she is also voted homecoming queen.

The movie came out in  1983, which was 20, I mean 30 years ago. Every now and again, I see a story in the news about a teenage girl playing football, but for the most part, things haven’t changed much in all these years.

There’s this article from last summer: Sami Grisafe, USA All-Star Female Quarterback, SLAYS National Anthem At Worlds


And evidently, this just came out last week–The Tackle Girls: One Team, One Mission


It turns out the Quarterback Princess is available on YouTube.

<And on a side note, the Superbowl ads would also have us believe that men do ALL the driving, too. I’ve never seen so many ads for cars and trucks.>

Warm Days & Snow Days

February 1 began with a thaw, rain, and by tomorrow, it’s supposed to be in the 50s. Two images encapsulate this past week where we had 3 1/2 snow days sandwiched by warm days.

ncweather

A friend who knows how stir-crazy I was getting sent this to me Friday morning. And it is how I felt on Friday when the ice and snow finally started to melt, and I left the house for almost the whole day!

snowday

 

 

A Partnership

Two years ago today Shane started a new job as VP of Quality Operations at a pharma company in Rocky Mount, NC. I thought he began in February, but I was reminded through his fb statis that today was his two year anniversary. He wasn’t looking for a new position, but a recruiter called, and the more he told me about the position and the company, the more I thought he might be crazy for wanting to entertain it.  Of course, I was in my first year as Director of Graduate Studies after 3 years as Director of Undergraduate Studies, so I had no real standing to talk about positions that people were crazy to take on. On top of that, we were also trying to start a family, and I had just gotten my treadmill and was dedicating myself to getting healthy and fit. It wasn’t until today that I realized those two life events (my dedication to my health and Shane’s new job) coincided. We were just living by the life decisions we made. That’s why it’s so important to reflect.

Anyway, we were pretty content and did we really want to try something new and uncertain? It seemed risky, and if it’s one thing I don’t do well with, it’s uncertainty. Shane on the other hand loves him a good challenge and pointed out I did too! We decided then he would explore the opportunity and go through the interview process which took weeks between Thanksgiving and Christmas. (not a stressful time at all.) The offer came in the week after Christmas and before New Years, and we got serious. I remember sitting with him at O’Charley’s (it’s now closed unfortunately as we solved many problems and made lots of decisions there), and we did a pros and cons list on my iphone. We did pros and cons of his current position and pros and cons of the new position. I think we were there 2 hours. I knew he wanted the position, but I was worried about the one hour commute there and back and some other risks of the new position. Basically, it came down to how confident he was that he could do the job and be successful. He was confident, and I was confident in him. That partnership and alignment began to outweigh any risks or uncertainty.  We negotiated with them on some things (I mean, we needed to buy a car b/c Shane would have to give his back to his employer at the time), and he accepted the position. He took 3 days off between jobs.

Now, he commutes an hour there and back, but he does have a nice ride to do it in. He laughs because when people heard he was moving this past summer, they said, “oh, you’re moving closer to Rocky Mount.” He said, “maybe 5-10 minutes closer, but my wife will be less than a mile from campus and her job.” People looked perplexed, but that’s the deal we made when we found the house this summer and weighed those pros and cons. Unfortunately, in the partnership on commute, my pro was his con, so it balanced things out or so my argument went. 😉 Our home is perfect, and we’ve had so many great memories in it already.

But of course neither of us could be content or successful or happy without each other’s support and understanding. And so we thrive as individuals and as a couple. And when we’re faced with decisions and paths, we weigh the risks and the benefits for us as individuals and our partnership, and we make a decision that considers all of these factors. We just celebrated 8 years, but I think the last two have been some of the best yet. But still there’s always uncertainty about the path forward and new decisions as opportunities come and go. But for now, we’re making plans, weighing pros and cons about life events, and hoping. We’re also remembering to be grateful for we continue to find incredible satisfaction in the work that we do. Our motto for the last year or so has been “Work Hard, Play Harder,” and as our friends and family can attest, we do this well and welcome others to do it with us. 🙂

 

Obesity as a Disease

Back in June, the American Medical Association delegates voted against the conclusions by their internal Council on Science and Public Health. The council concluded obesity should NOT be defined as a disease because the Body Mass Index (MBI) used to measure obesity  has issues “simplistic and flawed”.

Arguments for classifying obesity as a disease included the following:

more attention to obesity by the medical community,
reduction of stigma against those who are obese,
fits “some” of the criteria that makes a disease,
obesity can lead to heart disease and diabetes.
AMA recognizes obesity as disease

When I originally read about this over the summer, I wasn’t persuaded by the reasons for defining obesity as a disease, and it seemed like the medicalization of obesity might actually persuade people that there was not much they could do to help treat their condition.

And then I came across this article yesterday: “What harm is there in labeling obesity a disease

Turns out that some researchers wanted to document how the naming of obesity as a disease “has influenced health and diet messaging.” The results show that messages related to obesity can affect a person’s attitude towards their health and actually lead to less attempts at getting healthy. (Read the article for more specifics.)

All of this reminds of the time I requested my medical records back in 2012 after I was diagnosed with prediabetes. I wanted to understand things from the medical/scientific side of things. In the first line, I was described as a morbidly obese women. I’m thinking that a person should never really be described as morbid. I mean, it means unhealthy (ok, fine, that was true), unwholesome, gruesome.

But here’s the real issue for me: the measure of obesity is the body mass index (BMI). BMI is calculated by the ratio of height and weight, and a BMI of 30 or above is considered obese. That’s how one is diagnosed as having obesity. Yes, in some cases, measurements are made, and there’s research to show that the risk for a whole host of conditions and diseases is caused by obesity. However, none of this actually helps the person who is diagnosed. And treatments for obesity are losing weight, exercising, and surgery. I promise you that lots of people who are obese are experts as losing and gaining weight. What it also means is that a person can be healthy, fit, and obese.

Body Mass Index Chart

And even more troubling is that BMI is now the gold standard for qualifying for weight loss surgery and in measuring the success rates. BMI was never meant to diagnose anything is only part of the issue here. It’s now being used to diagnose and qualify people (mostly women) for risky surgeries that change what they can and can’t do with their body. So what if we questioned the use of BMI in this way?  What if we questioned why losing weight or BMI is the gold standard for health? Is it really about health or is it about reaching some ideal weight?

I’m been thinking lots about these kinds of questions lately as I made a decision NOT to have weight loss surgery because for me this last journey has never been about weight loss, it’s been about being full of healthy behaviors and habits. The weight loss has actually been the lagnaippe in my journey.

And to think, according to all of these charts and graphs and the medical establishment, I am still quite obese. Yesterday, I walked six miles because we had a snow day and I had the time to do it. I certainly feel pretty darn good about that. This is just the beginning of my writing on this issue. I welcome comments and feedback.

 

 

 

 

A Favorite Researcher/Writer: Brene Brown

I have been working on several longer posts over the last couple of days, and tomorrow, we’ll have a snow day, so I’m hoping to get ahead. If you’ve not watched the following video, I highly recommend it. Brene Brown is amazing, and she’s written some fabulous books. I’ll be writing more about them as well.

For those who prefer written text, here’s a transcript of her talk:

So, I’ll start with this: a couple years ago, an event planner called me because I was going to do a speaking event. And she called, and she said, “I’m really struggling with how to write about you on the little flier.” And I thought, “Well, what’s the struggle?” And she said, “Well, I saw you speak, and I’m going to call you a researcher, I think, but I’m afraid if I call you a researcher, no one will come, because they’ll think you’re boring and irrelevant.” (Laughter) And I was like, “Okay.” And she said, “But the thing I liked about your talk is you’re a storyteller. So I think what I’ll do is just call you a storyteller.” And of course, the academic, insecure part of me was like, “You’re going to call me a what?” And she said, “I’m going to call you a storyteller.” And I was like, “Why not magic pixie?” (Laughter) I was like, “Let me think about this for a second.” I tried to call deep on my courage. And I thought, you know, I am a storyteller. I’m a qualitative researcher. I collect stories; that’s what I do. And maybe stories are just data with a soul. And maybe I’m just a storyteller. And so I said, “You know what? Why don’t you just say I’m a researcher-storyteller.” And she went, “Haha. There’s no such thing.” (Laughter) So I’m a researcher-storyteller, and I’m going to talk to you today — we’re talking about expanding perception — and so I want to talk to you and tell some stories about a piece of my research that fundamentally expanded my perception and really actually changed the way that I live and love and work and parent.

And this is where my story starts. When I was a young researcher, doctoral student, my first year I had a research professor who said to us, “Here’s the thing, if you cannot measure it, it does not exist.” And I thought he was just sweet-talking me. I was like, “Really?” and he was like, “Absolutely.” And so you have to understand that I have a bachelor’s in social work, a master’s in social work, and I was getting my Ph.D. in social work, so my entire academic career was surrounded by people who kind of believed in the “life’s messy, love it.” And I’m more of the, “life’s messy, clean it up, organize it and put it into a bento box.” (Laughter) And so to think that I had found my way, to found a career that takes me — really, one of the big sayings in social work is, “Lean into the discomfort of the work.” And I’m like, knock discomfort upside the head and move it over and get all A’s. That was my mantra. So I was very excited about this. And so I thought, you know what, this is the career for me, because I am interested in some messy topics. But I want to be able to make them not messy. I want to understand them. I want to hack into these things I know are important and lay the code out for everyone to see.

So where I started was with connection. Because, by the time you’re a social worker for 10 years, what you realize is that connection is why we’re here. It’s what gives purpose and meaning to our lives. This is what it’s all about. It doesn’t matter whether you talk to people who work in social justice and mental health and abuse and neglect, what we know is that connection, the ability to feel connected, is — neurobiologically that’s how we’re wired — it’s why we’re here. So I thought, you know what, I’m going to start with connection. Well, you know that situation where you get an evaluation from your boss, and she tells you 37 things you do really awesome, and one thing — an “opportunity for growth?” (Laughter) And all you can think about is that opportunity for growth, right? Well, apparently this is the way my work went as well, because, when you ask people about love, they tell you about heartbreak. When you ask people about belonging, they’ll tell you their most excruciating experiences of being excluded. And when you ask people about connection, the stories they told me were about disconnection.

So very quickly — really about six weeks into this research — I ran into this unnamed thing that absolutely unraveled connection in a way that I didn’t understand or had never seen. And so I pulled back out of the research and thought, I need to figure out what this is. And it turned out to be shame. And shame is really easily understood as the fear of disconnection: Is there something about me that, if other people know it or see it, that I won’t be worthy of connection? The things I can tell you about it: it’s universal; we all have it. The only people who don’t experience shame have no capacity for human empathy or connection. No one wants to talk about it, and the less you talk about it the more you have it. What underpinned this shame, this “I’m not good enough,” — which we all know that feeling: “I’m not blank enough. I’m not thin enough, rich enough, beautiful enough, smart enough, promoted enough.” The thing that underpinned this was excruciating vulnerability, this idea of, in order for connection to happen, we have to allow ourselves to be seen, really seen.

And you know how I feel about vulnerability. I hate vulnerability. And so I thought, this is my chance to beat it back with my measuring stick. I’m going in, I’m going to figure this stuff out, I’m going to spend a year, I’m going to totally deconstruct shame, I’m going to understand how vulnerability works, and I’m going to outsmart it. So I was ready, and I was really excited. As you know, it’s not going to turn out well. (Laughter) You know this. So, I could tell you a lot about shame, but I’d have to borrow everyone else’s time. But here’s what I can tell you that it boils down to — and this may be one of the most important things that I’ve ever learned in the decade of doing this research. My one year turned into six years: thousands of stories, hundreds of long interviews, focus groups. At one point, people were sending me journal pages and sending me their stories — thousands of pieces of data in six years. And I kind of got a handle on it.

I kind of understood, this is what shame is, this is how it works. I wrote a book, I published a theory, but something was not okay — and what it was is that, if I roughly took the people I interviewed and divided them into people who really have a sense of worthiness — that’s what this comes down to, a sense of worthiness — they have a strong sense of love and belonging — and folks who struggle for it, and folks who are always wondering if they’re good enough. There was only one variable that separated the people who have a strong sense of love and belonging and the people who really struggle for it. And that was, the people who have a strong sense of love and belonging believe they’re worthy of love and belonging. That’s it. They believe they’re worthy. And to me, the hard part of the one thing that keeps us out of connection is our fear that we’re not worthy of connection, was something that, personally and professionally, I felt like I needed to understand better. So what I did is I took all of the interviews where I saw worthiness, where I saw people living that way, and just looked at those.

What do these people have in common? I have a slight office supply addiction, but that’s another talk. So I had a manila folder, and I had a Sharpie, and I was like, what am I going to call this research? And the first words that came to my mind were whole-hearted. These are whole-hearted people, living from this deep sense of worthiness. So I wrote at the top of the manila folder, and I started looking at the data. In fact, I did it first in a four-day very intensive data analysis, where I went back, pulled these interviews, pulled the stories, pulled the incidents. What’s the theme? What’s the pattern? My husband left town with the kids because I always go into this Jackson Pollock crazy thing, where I’m just like writing and in my researcher mode. And so here’s what I found. What they had in common was a sense of courage. And I want to separate courage and bravery for you for a minute. Courage, the original definition of courage, when it first came into the English language — it’s from the Latin word cor, meaning heart — and the original definition was to tell the story of who you are with your whole heart. And so these folks had, very simply, the courage to be imperfect. They had the compassion to be kind to themselves first and then to others, because, as it turns out, we can’t practice compassion with other people if we can’t treat ourselves kindly. And the last was they had connection, and — this was the hard part — as a result of authenticity, they were willing to let go of who they thought they should be in order to be who they were, which you have to absolutely do that for connection.

The other thing that they had in common was this: They fully embraced vulnerability. They believed that what made them vulnerable made them beautiful. They didn’t talk about vulnerability being comfortable, nor did they really talk about it being excruciating — as I had heard it earlier in the shame interviewing. They just talked about it being necessary. They talked about the willingness to say, “I love you” first, the willingness to do something where there are no guarantees, the willingness to breathe through waiting for the doctor to call after your mammogram. They’re willing to invest in a relationship that may or may not work out. They thought this was fundamental.

I personally thought it was betrayal. I could not believe I had pledged allegiance to research, where our job — you know, the definition of research is to control and predict, to study phenomena, for the explicit reason to control and predict. And now my mission to control and predict had turned up the answer that the way to live is with vulnerability and to stop controlling and predicting. This led to a little breakdown — (Laughter) — which actually looked more like this. (Laughter) And it did. I call it a breakdown; my therapist calls it a spiritual awakening. A spiritual awakening sounds better than breakdown, but I assure you it was a breakdown. And I had to put my data away and go find a therapist. Let me tell you something: you know who you are when you call your friends and say, “I think I need to see somebody. Do you have any recommendations?” Because about five of my friends were like, “Wooo. I wouldn’t want to be your therapist.” (Laughter) I was like, “What does that mean?” And they’re like, “I’m just saying, you know. Don’t bring your measuring stick.” I was like, “Okay.”

So I found a therapist. My first meeting with her, Diana — I brought in my list of the way the whole-hearted live, and I sat down. And she said, “How are you?” And I said, “I’m great. I’m okay.” She said, “What’s going on?” And this is a therapist who sees therapists, because we have to go to those, because their B.S. meters are good. (Laughter) And so I said, “Here’s the thing, I’m struggling.” And she said, “What’s the struggle?” And I said, “Well, I have a vulnerability issue. And I know that vulnerability is the core of shame and fear and our struggle for worthiness, but it appears that it’s also the birthplace of joy, of creativity, of belonging, of love. And I think I have a problem, and I need some help.” And I said, “But here’s the thing: no family stuff, no childhood shit.” (Laughter) “I just need some strategies.” (Laughter) (Applause) Thank you. So she goes like this. (Laughter) And then I said, “It’s bad, right?” And she said, “It’s neither good nor bad.” (Laughter) “It just is what it is.” And I said, “Oh my God, this is going to suck.”

(Laughter)

And it did, and it didn’t. And it took about a year. And you know how there are people that, when they realize that vulnerability and tenderness are important, that they surrender and walk into it. A: that’s not me, and B: I don’t even hang out with people like that. (Laughter) For me, it was a yearlong street fight. It was a slugfest. Vulnerability pushed, I pushed back. I lost the fight, but probably won my life back.

And so then I went back into the research and spent the next couple of years really trying to understand what they, the whole-hearted, what choices they were making, and what are we doing with vulnerability. Why do we struggle with it so much? Am I alone in struggling with vulnerability? No. So this is what I learned. We numb vulnerability — when we’re waiting for the call. It was funny, I sent something out on Twitter and on Facebook that says, “How would you define vulnerability? What makes you feel vulnerable?” And within an hour and a half, I had 150 responses. Because I wanted to know what’s out there. Having to ask my husband for help because I’m sick, and we’re newly married; initiating sex with my husband; initiating sex with my wife; being turned down; asking someone out; waiting for the doctor to call back; getting laid off; laying off people — this is the world we live in. We live in a vulnerable world. And one of the ways we deal with it is we numb vulnerability.

And I think there’s evidence — and it’s not the only reason this evidence exists, but I think it’s a huge cause — we are the most in-debt, obese, addicted and medicated adult cohort in U.S. history. The problem is — and I learned this from the research — that you cannot selectively numb emotion. You can’t say, here’s the bad stuff. Here’s vulnerability, here’s grief, here’s shame, here’s fear, here’s disappointment. I don’t want to feel these. I’m going to have a couple of beers and a banana nut muffin. (Laughter) I don’t want to feel these. And I know that’s knowing laughter. I hack into your lives for a living. God. (Laughter) You can’t numb those hard feelings without numbing the other affects, our emotions. You cannot selectively numb. So when we numb those, we numb joy, we numb gratitude, we numb happiness. And then we are miserable, and we are looking for purpose and meaning, and then we feel vulnerable, so then we have a couple of beers and a banana nut muffin. And it becomes this dangerous cycle.

One of the things that I think we need to think about is why and how we numb. And it doesn’t just have to be addiction. The other thing we do is we make everything that’s uncertain certain. Religion has gone from a belief in faith and mystery to certainty. I’m right, you’re wrong. Shut up. That’s it. Just certain. The more afraid we are, the more vulnerable we are, the more afraid we are. This is what politics looks like today. There’s no discourse anymore. There’s no conversation. There’s just blame. You know how blame is described in the research? A way to discharge pain and discomfort. We perfect. If there’s anyone who wants their life to look like this, it would be me, but it doesn’t work. Because what we do is we take fat from our butts and put it in our cheeks. (Laughter) Which just, I hope in 100 years, people will look back and go, “Wow.”

(Laughter)

And we perfect, most dangerously, our children. Let me tell you what we think about children. They’re hardwired for struggle when they get here. And when you hold those perfect little babies in your hand, our job is not to say, “Look at her, she’s perfect. My job is just to keep her perfect — make sure she makes the tennis team by fifth grade and Yale by seventh grade.” That’s not our job. Our job is to look and say, “You know what? You’re imperfect, and you’re wired for struggle, but you are worthy of love and belonging.” That’s our job. Show me a generation of kids raised like that, and we’ll end the problems I think that we see today. We pretend that what we do doesn’t have an effect on people. We do that in our personal lives. We do that corporate — whether it’s a bailout, an oil spill, a recall — we pretend like what we’re doing doesn’t have a huge impact on other people. I would say to companies, this is not our first rodeo, people. We just need you to be authentic and real and say, “We’re sorry. We’ll fix it.”

But there’s another way, and I’ll leave you with this. This is what I have found: to let ourselves be seen, deeply seen, vulnerably seen; to love with our whole hearts, even though there’s no guarantee — and that’s really hard, and I can tell you as a parent, that’s excruciatingly difficult — to practice gratitude and joy in those moments of terror, when we’re wondering, “Can I love you this much? Can I believe in this this passionately? Can I be this fierce about this?” just to be able to stop and, instead of catastrophizing what might happen, to say, “I’m just so grateful, because to feel this vulnerable means I’m alive.” And the last, which I think is probably the most important, is to believe that we’re enough. Because when we work from a place, I believe, that says, “I’m enough,” then we stop screaming and start listening, we’re kinder and gentler to the people around us, and we’re kinder and gentler to ourselves.

That’s all I have. Thank you.

(Applause)